Suzuki Burgman Street vs TVS Ntorq 125 RE
On the measurable specs below, the two are level: each is ahead on 3.
| 124 cc | Engine | 124.79 cc (better) |
|---|---|---|
| 8.7 PS | Power | 9.4 PS (better) |
| 10.2 Nm | Torque | 10.5 Nm (better) |
| 108 kg (better) | Kerb weight | 118 kg |
| 780 mm | Seat height | – |
| 5.6 L (better) | Fuel tank | 5 L |
| 160 mm (better) | Ground clearance | 155 mm |
Every spec
| 4-Stroke, 1 Cylinder, Air Cooled | Type | Single Cylinder, 4 - Stroke, SI, Air Cooled |
|---|---|---|
| 124 cc | Displacement | 124.79 cc |
| 8.6 bhp @ 7000 rpm | Max power | 9.25 HP @ 7500 rpm |
| 10.2N - m @ 5000 rpm | Max torque | 10.5 Nm @ 5500 rpm |
| Electric and Kick | Starting | – |
| SOHC, 2 valve; Suzuki Eco Performance (SEP) | Other | – |
| CVT | Other | – |
|---|
| Disc | Front brake | Disc 220mm with SBT |
|---|---|---|
| Drum | Rear brake | Drum: Dia Drum 130mm |
| Telescopic | Front suspension | Telescopic Suspension with Hydraulic Dampers |
| Hydraulic Type | Rear suspension | Coil Spring with Hydraulic Dampers |
| 90/90-12 54J Tubeless | Front tyre | Tubeless 100/80-12 |
| 90/100-10 54J Tubeless | Rear tyre | Tubeless 110/80-12 |
| Combined Brake System (CBS) | Other | – |
| – | Frame | High Rigidity Under Bone Rectangular Tubular Type |
| 1,880 x 675 x 1,140 mm | Length x width x height | 1865x710x1160 mm |
|---|---|---|
| 1,265 mm | Wheelbase | 1285mm |
| 160 mm | Ground clearance | 155mm |
| 780 mm | Seat height | – |
| 108 kg | Kerb weight | 118 kg |
| 5.6 L | Fuel tank | 5.0 litre |
| Maintenance Free 12V, 3Ah | Battery | 12V, 4 Ah MF |
|---|---|---|
| LED | Headlight | LED lamp |
| LED | Tail light | – |
| Digital | Instrument cluster | – |
Compare one of these with something else: Burgman Street or Ntorq 125 RE.